Solution 1 Exercise 4 propeller type aircraft from last week Selected Aircraft from last week s module Cessna 172 Make sure to review your data and
Solution Exercise propeller type aircraft from last week Selected Aircraft from last week s module Cessna Make
Solution Exercise propeller type aircraft from last week Selected Aircraft from last week
aircraft from last week Selected Aircraft from last week s module Cessna Make sure to review your data and
Solution Exercise propeller type aircraft from last week Selected Aircraft from
last week s module Cessna Make sure to review your data and
Solution Exercise propeller type aircraft from last week
Solution Exercise propeller type
(Solution) 1 Exercise 4: propeller type) aircraft from last week. Selected Aircraft (from last week's module): Cessna 172 Make sure to review your data and...

Category: General
Words: 1050
Amount: $12
Writer:

Paper instructions

Upload is my assignment. Need serious help. Can you answer these questions for me? 1 Exercise 4: Drag and Applications The first part of this week’s assignment is to revisit our reciprocating engine powered (i.e. propeller type) aircraft from last week. 1. Selected Aircraft (from last week’s module): Cessna 172 Make sure to review your data and results from last week and any feedback that you may have received on your work, in order to prevent continuing with faulty data. 2. Main Wing Airfoil type & on-line database designator (from last week’s module): NACA 4412 3. Aircraft Maximum Gross Weight [lbs] (from last week’s module): 2450lbs 4. Wing Span [ft] (from last week’s module): 36ft 5. Average Chord Length [ft] (from last week’s module): 5ft 6. Wing Area ‘S’ [ft 2 ] (from last week’s module): 174 7. Find the Aspect Ratio ‘AR’ for your selected aircraft wing. (Use the wing span and average chord length from last week’s module/from above. See also page 63 in your textbook.): 7.2 8. C Lmax for your airfoil (from last week’s module): 5 9. Standard sea level Stall Speed ‘V s ’ for your aircraft [kts] (from last week’s calculation): Vso= 189.8 ft/sec 112 kts Find the appropriate drag polar curve for your airfoil selection (2. above; from last week’s module). You can utilize any officially published airfoil diagram for your selected airfoil or use again the Airfoil Tool at http://airfoiltools.com/search . This document was developed for online learning in ASCI 309. File name: Ex_4_Drag&Applica±ons Updated: 07/11/2015 https://www.coursehero.com/tutors-problems/Business/9064205 9064205 Government subsidies for new energy sources are often criticized as wasteful spending. Your own opinion to answer the following question: Government subsidies for new energy sources are often criticized as wasteful spending. Your own opinion to answer the following question: Should development of renewable energy sources such as solar, wind and hydrogen energy be left to private enterprise? Why or why not?  If reference is used needs to be in APA format this is actually an environmental science class. https://www.coursehero.com/tutors-problems/Business/9064207 9064207 Write a paper of 500-750 words that explains the relationship between finance and accounting, and how they operate to determine financial viability... Write a paper of 500-750 words that explains the relationship between finance and accounting, and how they operate to determine financial viability within a health care organization.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. So everything must be put into APA format, and make sure you use your own words or else it will come up on Turnitin.com All sources must be within the last 10 yearsThank you, I placed the rubric down belowDetermining Financial Viability 70.0 %Content 40.0 % Essay on Relationship Between Finance and Accounting in Determining Financial Viability of the Organization Does not demonstrate an understanding of the business concepts specified in the assignment, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale. Demonstrates only minimal understanding of the business concepts specified in the assignment. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale Demonstrates knowledge of the business concepts specified in the assignment, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions. Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the business concepts specified in the assignment. Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples. Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the business concepts specified in the assignment, and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropriate examples.30.0 % Integrates Information From Outside Resources into the Body of Paper Does not use references, examples, or explanations. Provides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no published references. Supports main points with examples and explanations. Supports main points with explanations and examples. Application and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria. Supports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.8.0 % Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format 5.0 % Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.5.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting are appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present Reference page is inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.100 % Total Weightage  

Answer

Get Essay Answer
1,200,000+ Questions
Satisfaction guaranteed