Solution 1 In the history of ethics two major viewpoints emerge the consequentialist based on or concerned with consequences and the nonconsequentialist
Solution In the history of ethics two major viewpoints emerge the consequentialist based on or concerned
Solution In the history of ethics two major viewpoints emerge the consequentialist
of ethics two major viewpoints emerge the consequentialist based on or concerned with consequences and the nonconsequentialist
Solution In the history of ethics two major viewpoints emerge
the consequentialist based on or concerned with consequences and the nonconsequentialist
Solution In the history of ethics two major
Solution In the history
(Solution) 1 In the history of ethics, two major viewpoints emerge: the consequentialist (based on or concerned with consequences) and the nonconsequentialist...

Category: General
Words: 1050
Amount: $12
Writer:

Paper instructions

I need help with the attached assignment. Using the readings that I've attached you will prepare a three-page research paper using the instructions attached. I'll take care of the reference paper, let me know if there is any questions, thanks. 1 In the history of ethics, two major viewpoints emerge: the consequentialist (based on or concerned with consequences) and the nonconsequentialist (not based on or concerned with consequences). Traditionally these have been called the “teleological” and “deontological” theories, respectively, but this book will refer to them as consequentialist and nonconsequentialist because these words pinpoint the real differences between them. The two major consequentialist ethical theories are ethical egoism and utilitarianism. Both these theories agree that human beings ought to behave in ways that will bring about good consequences. They differ, however, in that they disagree on who should benefit from these consequences. The ethical egoist essentially says that human beings ought to act in their own self-interest, whereas utilitarians essentially say that human beings ought to act in the interests of all concerned. Suppose John has a chance to embezzle some funds from the company for which he works. If he is a consequentialist, he will try to predict the consequences of embezzling and not embezzling. If he is an egoistic consequentialist, he will try to predict what will be in his own best interest; if he is a utilitarian consequentialist, he will try to predict what will be in the interest of everyone concerned. On first learning about ethical egoism, some people immediately assume that if a person like John adheres to this theory, he will embezzle the funds, because doing so will give him the money he needs in order to live a good life and so forth. However, it is interesting to note that both ethical

Answer

Get Essay Answer
1,200,000+ Questions
Satisfaction guaranteed